.
Feedback

'Tan Mom' Isn’t the Only One Who Deserves Scrutiny

We have epidemics running rampant in our society that are doing far more damage to our children than tanning. So where’s the outrage there?

Patricia Krencil, the “Tan Mom," has been in the news a lot in the last month or so. Everything from her fitness as a parent to her sanity has been called into question because of the way she looks and her compulsive tanning. And now  she’s been brought up on charges of second-degree child endangerment to boot.


I think it’s appalling that this woman has been badgered and bullied openly in the media simply because she looks different and has a compulsion about her appearance. But that’s where bullying always starts, with people who are different — gay, geek, goth, etc. It’s bullying pure and simple. Some would argue that it’s about this woman’s health and her child’s well-being, and that I would label as hypocrisy.

Dermatologist Dr. Jessica Wu wrote a piece for HLNTV asking people not to make fun of the “Tan Mom.” Dr. Wu said, “It’s easy to make fun of 'Tan Mom' because her behavior is as outrageous as the color of her skin. But why is it OK to make fun of tan people, when it’s not OK to ridicule people because of their weight? After all, tanning, like being overweight, is a health risk. Just as obesity is linked to heart disease and diabetes, indoor tanning has been linked to malignant melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer.”

I'd like to take Dr. Wu’s point a step further. For me, it’s certainly not about making fun of someone for the way they behave or look. But it’s definitely about the safety of their children and those around them. I firmly believe that as a society, we should step in and protect children when their parents are endangering them. But if we’re going to do it, let’s do it across the board, because anything less is blatant hypocrisy.

Let’s step in and protect children from parents who feed them a steady diet of junk and fast food. Child obesity is epidemic in this country. Parents are the cause of this. Children do not grocery shop for themselves, and they don’t drive themselves to an endless string of fast food restaurants because it’s more convenient. Children are being diagnosed with diseases like heart disease and diabetes once only found in adults. And we’re going to make a big deal out of one case of a mom possibly letting her child tan in a tanning booth?

Let’s step in and protect children from parents who smoke. I pulled into a parking lot the other day and watched as a mom and dad, who were both smoking cigarettes, got out of the car and then proceeded to pull their child out of its car seat. All the while continuing to smoke their cigarettes by the way. I couldn’t help but think to myself, “Well, at least they had the child in a car seat, but that’s certainly not going to do anything to protect that child from the lung damage we know second-hand smoke causes.”  Where’s the outrage here? Why aren’t those parents being brought up on child endangerment charges?

Let’s step in and protect children from parents who drink and then drive the kids home from the restaurant or up to the mall. If I had a dime for every time I’ve heard “but I’ve only had a couple of beers!” We know for a fact that even a little alcohol consumption slows reaction time and impairs judgment and coordination, all of which are necessary to drive a car safely. Let’s not even get into the violence and chaos inflicted on children directly due to alcohol use in the home.

I’m OK with people making choices that end up damaging themselves. It’s their life and they can live it as they wish. But when their behaviors start putting others in harm's way, a line is crossed, especially when it involves children. The parents in these three groups are doing indisputable damage to their children, and there’s a lot more of them out there than there are moms who let their children go to tanning salons.

So where’s the outrage in these cases? Where are the charges being filed for child endangerment? Let’s be real. We’re going after Patricia Krencil not because we’re concerned for her or her daughter’s health and safety, we’re going after her for the same reasons we always go after people — because she looks different and behaves a bit quirky.

Let’s stop hiding behind hypocrisy and “good sounding arguments” and call it what it is. It’s not concern for their well being — it’s entertainment, it’s bullying and it’s very disappointing to see.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Simsbury Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Robert Kalechman May 24, 2013 at 10:52 pm
Why is it that on Memorial Day or Decoration Day as my seniors refer to in Simsbury people forRead More political reasons always give the honor of the Memorial Day address and allows politics and politiiocians o use a solemn day that all veterans recognize as sacred? I have witnessed these politicians who look upon Memorial Day as jollow and in most cases refuse to serve in the Armed Forces and tookl the easy road of derferment after deferment? Over the years plaques, awards in my opinion have been bestowed on oficials who have done very little if anything to honor veterans, less than a decade ago these same elected officials closed the State Veterans Hospital at Rocky Hill thus taking away services needed by returning state veterans. Time and time again this state's politicians , particularly legislators, have taken away benefits deserved and awarded by a grateful state and nation. Case in point, the Soldiers, Sailors, Marine and Air Foprce Fund was taken away partially and put into the State of Connecticut's Geneeral Fund. Prison beds disgarded by the Department of Corrections were given to the Roky Hill Veterans Home and Hospital. I can present fact after fact showing the neglect and uncaring attitude towards the state's veterans budget which legislatores have been remiss in providing care to veterans as was promised. Why Simsbury's legislators are chosen to have the honor which they do not disserve? There is a bill before the State Legislatue that wants to stop the State Soldiers and Sailors and Marines fund being proposed by the Democratically controlled State Legislature. It seems that the Simsbury's lMemorial Day parades in past years have turned into ,meet. greet amd handshake that Simsubury's politicians use to further their political ambitions and garner votes which to the credit of a previous American Legion Commander who spoke out against political politicians who while marching break ranks to garner votes.Please allow my brothers and sisters veteans to honor our comrades who have made the supreme sacrifice and keep this State of ours above politics as ususial in Simsbury.
molly mead May 23, 2013 at 08:45 am
The article says it provides information about "various ways" the community can helpRead More teachers. However, it provides information only about the Staples discount program. The link takes you to a Staples website, not to a list of ways communities are helping. In addition, statistics given are national, not relating to Simsbury, or even Connecticut. This seems like a canned article designed to promote Staples. Was it written and submitted by that retailer?